Peer Models of Excellence

UTSA has identified ten institutions to serve as peer models of excellence. We will emulate their strategies and best practices throughout our strategic planning process, and use their metrics as benchmarks in select areas. 



  • Location: Tempe, Arizona
  • Total Enrollment: 97,849
  • Established: 1886
Learn More »

  • Location: Miami, Florida
  • Total Enrollment: 55,003
  • Established: 1965

Learn More »


  • Location: Fairfax, Virginia
  • Total Enrollment: 34,909
  • Established: 1949

Learn More »


  • Location: Atlanta, Georgia
  • Total Enrollment: 32,146
  • Established: 1913

Learn More »


  • Location: Portland, Oregon
  • Total Enrollment: 26,627
  • Established: 1946

Learn More »


  • Location: Irvine, California
  • Total Enrollment: 32,911
  • Established: 1965

Learn More »


  • Location: Riverside, California
  • Total Enrollment: 22,577
  • Established: 1954

Learn More »


  • Location: Santa Cruz, California
  • Total Enrollment: 18,599
  • Established: 1965

Learn More »


  • Location: Baltimore, Maryland
  • Total Enrollment: 13,640
  • Established: 1966

Learn More »

UCF
  • Location: Orlando, Florida
  • Total Enrollment: 66,183
  • Established: 1963

Learn More »

Origination

The University of Texas System Strategic Planning and Peer Selection Task Force convened in October 2017 to assist all UT institutions with identifying campus specific aspirational peers and strategic growth goals for 2030. The overarching goal of the task force was to align UT institutions with the 60x30TX State Higher Education plan.

Using the approach laid out by U.T. System, UTSA’s peer institutions were selected for their aspirational qualities that can be used to gauge UTSA’s progress.

Why these 10 institutions?

Each of the ten institutions have rapidly ascended to new levels of excellence within a specific period – typically the last ten years—proving that systemic change is possible over a relatively short time frame. Their specific areas of excellence are included within each peer profile,

In addition to representing a blend aspirational qualities, other relevant factors were considered including the institution’s age, membership in Coalition of Urban Serving Universities, urban location, demography and size.

Because these peer institutions were not selected based solely on how closely they mirror UTSA’s profile, data comparisons will have certain limitations. This is especially true in areas such as fundraising (due to UTSA’s youth and relatively small alumni base) and athletics (due to differing athletic conferences).

Comparison Data: UTSA and Peer Models of Excellence

See how UTSA compares to our 10 institutional peer models of excellence in key areas over the last decade.