|
1
|
- Proposal Development
- and Review Team
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Statutory Tuition is set by the Legislature (has been $50/SCH since Fall 2005) and
is the same for all UT institutions.
- Considered to be General
Revenue-Dedicated as an offset to academic formula funding (in an amount
estimated in the General Appropriations Act (GAA).
- Institution bears impact of any over or under collection of budgeted
revenue.
|
|
10
|
- Designated Tuition was deregulated by the Texas
- Legislature in 2003, allowing public universities to
- counteract decreasing State appropriations.
- Considered a local source of revenue; the rate charged is set by
- each institution as approved by the Board of Regents:
- FY 07 = $92.25/SCH FY 08 =
$101/SCH
- Covers general operational costs
- Primary source of new faculty and strategic initiatives funding
- 20% of the amount collected from UG and 15% from GR over $46/SCH is set
aside for student financial aid.
|
|
11
|
- New fees & rate changes are established for two years to
- allow better planning. Tuition
& Fee Proposals are
- approved by the Board of Regents in between the legislative
- session - “off year.”
- Fee revenues must be spent in accordance with the fee justification and
Texas Education Code.
- Mandatory Fees:
- Required to be paid by all students.
- New fees and/or fee rate changes must be approved by the Board of
Regents (BoR)
- Incidental or Course Fees:
- Fees are paid based on student or user choices, or as a good/service is
actually used; not all incidental fees are optional but apply to all
students taking a particular course, lab or within a college (e.g.
advising fees.)
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Designated Tuition is the only new discretionary funding source in the 2nd
year of the Biennium.
- Limited additional opportunities for internal reallocation without a
comprehensive review of all funding use.
- President/CMO have made recommendations to fund allocations for:
- 3% Merit Package
- Faculty Promotion/Tenure + Staff Equity Pool
- Benefits
- E&G Space Support / Safety & Security
- New Faculty
- Debt Service
- Required Financial Aid Set-aside
|
|
23
|
- Major challenge – modeling what impact the new Admissions’ criteria will
have on tuition revenue?
- Expect an enrollment loss from the prior year?!
- How much? We’ve estimated
~0.8%
- Summer is our trailing semester & has steadily declined. Will this trend continue?
- Elasticity of demand as tuition & fee rates continue to increase
|
|
24
|
- Budget for E&G Utility costs is funded from:
- General Revenue
- Student Paid Energy Fee
- FY07 $45/head/semester $2.8 M
- FY08 $35/head/semester $2.259
M
- FY09 and beyond – eliminate this fee by incorporating revenue
requirements into the designated tuition rate at the recommendation of
The UT System – will include a financial aid portion.
|
|
25
|
- 2009 E&G Utility Cost Est.
$10.60M
- Rate/demand increase of 8%
- $1.1 M beyond construction demand for Engineering Bldg
- 2009 E&G Utility Cost Est.
$11.45M
- Rate/demand increase of 8%
- No new facilities on line
|
|
26
|
- Funding Item Est. Increment Required
- 3% Merit Package $ 3,160,000
- Faculty Promotion
250,000
- Staff Equity Pool
200,000
- Benefits
600,000
- E&G Space Support
787,334
- New Faculty & Staff 1,500,000
- Debt Service
112,759
- Financial Aid Set-aside 1,760,430
- Utility Costs (replace fee) 2,259,300
|
|
27
|
- Total Required
$10,579,823
- Less
- Prior Year Unallocated Base
<979,823>
- Net Required
9,600,000
- Base SCH for FY 2009 640,000
- Proposed Designated Tuition Rate $116 / SCH
|
|
28
|
- Strategic Issues:
- Enrollment – 1 year after new Admissions’ standards
- New Faculty – needed to become a premier research intensive university
- New Staff – to support workload & enrollment growth
- Utility/New Facilities:
Engineering Building will open
- Other Strategic Requirements?
- Amount of new State Appropriation –
- Revenues at the state level available?
- Other issues at the legislative level?
|
|
29
|
- Assumptions:
- UTSA will obtain the same level of appropriation increase in FY 2010
as in FY 2008.
- Enrollment will regain the loss anticipated in 08-09 due to an
increase in our admissions’ criteria.
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|