Comparative Electrotonic Analysis of Three Classes of Rat Hippocampal Neurons
Nicholas T. Carnevale1,2, Kenneth Y. Tsai1,2, Brenda J. Claiborne4, and Thomas H. Brown1-3
1Center for Theoretical and Applied Neuroscince, 2Department of Psychology, and 3Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520; and 4Division of Life Sciences,
University of Texas at San Antonio,
San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA
The Journal of Neurophysiology,1997 August, 78(2):703-720


ABSTRACT

We present a comparative analysis of electrotonus in the three classes of principal neurons in rat hippocampus: pyramidal cells of the CA1 and CA3c fields of the hippocampus proper, and granule cells of the dentate gyrus. This analysis used the electrotonic transform, which combines anatomic and biophysical data to map neuronal anatomy into electrotonic space, where physical distance between points is replaced by the logarithm of voltage attenuation (log A). The transforms were rendered as "neuromorphic figures" by redraing the cell with branch lengths proportional to log A along each branch. We also used plots of log A versus anatomic distance from the soma; these reveal features that are otherwise less apparent and facilitate comparisons between dendritic fields of different cells. Transforms were always larger for voltage spreading toward the soma (Vin) than away from it (Vout). Most of the electrotonic length in Vout transforms was along proximal large diameter branches where signal loss for somatofugal voltage spread is greatest. In Vin transforms, more of the length was in thin distal branches, indicating a steep voltage gradient for signals propagating toward the soma. All transforms lengthened substantially with increasing frequency. CA1 neurons were electrotonically significantly larger than CA3c neurons. Their Vout transforms displayed one primary apical dendrite, which bifurcated in some cases, whereas CA3c cell transforms exhibited multiple apical branches. In both cell classes, basilar dendrite Vout transforms were small, indicating that somatic potentials reached their distal ends with little attenuation. However, for somatopetal voltage spread, attenuation along the basilar and apical dendrites was comparable, so the Vin transforms of these dendritic fields were nearly equal in extent. Granule cells were physically and electrotonically most compact. Their Vout transforms at 0 Hz were very small, indicating near isopotentiality at DC and low frequencies. These transforms resembled those of the basilar dendrites of CA1 and CA3c pyramidal cells. This raises the possibility of similar functional or computational roles for these dendritic fields. Interpreting the anatomic distribution of thorny excrescences on CA3 pyramidal neurons with this approach indicates that synaptic currents generated by some mossy fiber inputs may be recorded accurately by a somatic patch clamp, providing that strict criteria on their time course are satisfied. Similar accuracy may not be achievable in somatic recordings of Schaffer collateral synapses onto CA1 pyramidal cells in light of the anatomic and biophysical properties of these neurons and the spatial distribution of synapses.

Figure 1



The total attenuation over path ikis the product of the attenuations along the branches ij and jk. See text for details.

Figure 2



Top and middle: Each unbranched dendritic segment can be described by an equivalent T circuit consisting of one transverse and two axial impedances (Carnevale and Johnston 1982). If the diameter is constant and the electrical properties of the membrane and cytoplasm are uniform over the segment, then the axial impedances (Za) are symmetric as shown here. However, the conclusions from two-port theory still apply even if the axial impedances are not symmetric. Bottom: Voltage attenuation VO/Vl over a cylindrical segment depends on the axial (Za) and transverse (Zm) impedances and any load impedance (Zload) at the downstream end of the segment. For voltage spread away from the cell body, Zload includes the somatofugal input impedances of any daughter branches. For voltage spread toward the cell body, Zload includes the somatopetal input impedance of the parent and the somatofugal input impedance of any sibling branches.

Figure 3



Left: Two-dimensional projection of the anatomy of a CA1 pyramidal neuron (cell 524). Right: neuromorphic renderings of the electrotonic transforms of this cell computed at DC (0 Hz} and 40 Hz for somatofugal (Vout, upper) and somatopetal (Vin, lower) signal flow. The primary apical dendrite dominates the Vout transforms, while the basilar and terminal branches appear much smaller. In the Vin transforms the basilars and terminal branches are the most prominent features.

Figure 4



Plots of the logarithm of attenuation at DC as a function of physical distance from the soma (log A vs. x) for the Vout (left) and Vin (right) transforms of the CA1 neuron of Fig. 3. Positive distances along the x axis correspond to the apical dendrites, and the basilars are shown at negative distances. For Vout, the primary apical dendrite stands out as a diagonal that gives rise to many tributaries that are almost horizontal (the nearly isopotential terminal branches). In the Vin transform these branches are much steeper than the primary apical because of the rapid attenuation of voltage along their length.

Figure 5



Left: Two-dimensional projection of the anatomy of a CA1 pyramidal neuron (cell 503). Right: Vout (upper) and Vin (lower) neuromorphic figures at DC and 40 Hz. The primary apical dendrite bifurcates close to the cell body, giving rise to a pair of branches that dominate the Vout transforms. The basilar and terminal branches, nearly inconspicuous in the Vout transforms, are the most noticeable aspects of the Vin transforms.

Figure 6



Log A vs. x plots at DC for the Vout and Vin transforms of the CA1 neuron in Fig. 5. For Vout, the steep diagonals of the twinned primary apical dendrites are quite distinct from their nearly horizontal daughter branches. As in Fig. 4, the terminal branches are much steeper in the Vin plot because of the more rapid decline of voltage with distance for voltage spread toward the soma.

Figure 7



Left: Two dimensional anatomic projection of a CA3c pyramidal neuron (cell 701). Right: Vout and Vin neuromorphic figures at DC and 40 Hz. This cell has several roughly equivalent apical dendritic branches instead of a single primary apical dendrite. As in the CA1 cells of Figs. 3 and 5, however, the basilar and terminal branches of this cell are very small in the Vout transforms yet quite prominent in the Vin transforms.

Figure 8



Log A vs. x plots at DC for the Vout and Vin transforms of the CA3c neuron in Fig. 7. The four steep diagonals correspond to the cluster of proximal apical branches in Fig. 7. The slopes of the terminal branches and basilar dendrites depend on the direction of signal propagation, as in Figs. 4 and 6.

Figure 9



Left: Two-dimensional anatomic projection of a granule cell (cell 964). Right: Vout and Vin neuromorphic figures at DC and 40 Hz. Granule cells are electrotonically more compact than either CA1 or CA3 neurons. The dendritic branches have nearly identical electrotonic lengths.

Figure 10



Log A vs. x plots at DC for the Vout and Vin transforms of the granule cell in Fig. 9. As in pyramidal cells, terminal branches are nearly horizontal in the Vout figure because of their sealed--end terminations. The Vin figure displays much greater attenuation for potential spread from the dendrites toward the soma.

Figure 11



Left: Two-dimensional anatomical projection of a granule cell (cell 950). The soma of this neuron lies in a deeper layer of the dentate gyrus than the cell displayed in Figs. 9 and 10. It has a short apical branch that gives rise to the remainder of the dendritic tree. Right: Vout and Vin neuromorphic figures at DC and 40 Hz. The short initial apical segment accounts for about one-third of the electrotonic extent of the cell for somatofugal voltage transfer

Figure 12



Log A vs. x plots at DC for the Vout and Vin transforms of the granule cell in Fig. 11. The initial apical segment is nearly vertical in the Vout plot because of the steep spatial gradient of voltage spreading from the soma to the dendrites. This segment is nearly horizontal in the Vin plot because it is almost isopotential along its length for voltage spreading from the dendrites to the soma.

Figure 13



Maximum anatomical and electrotonic measures of the dendrites of granule cells and the apical dendrites of CA1and CA3c pyramidal cells. A. The values of xmax. B and C: Lmaxout for DC and 40 Hz. D and E: Lmaxin for DC and 40 Hz. Obvious differences between cell classes in these plots turned out to be statistically significant (Table 1). See text for details.

Figure 14



Maximum anatomic and electrotonic measures of the dendrites of granule cells and the basilar dendrites of CAl and CA3c pyramidal cells. A: The values of xmax. B and C: Lmaxout for DC and 40 Hz. D and E: Lmaxin for DC and 40 Hz. Obvious differences between cell classes in these plots turned out to be statistically significant (Table 1). See text for details.

Figure 15


Side by side comparison of the log A vs. x plots at DC for Vout in a CA1 neuron (cell 503) and a granule cell (cell 964). The range of attenuations and their variation with distance are very similar. This suggests possible functional parallels between dendritic fields in these cell classes