Accessibility-Friendly Tools

Below are UT San Antonio approved tools that include built-in accessibility features that make it easier for you to produce materials for our campus community. To see how to use each tool’s accessibility features, visit the Resources page.

If you use a tool that is not listed here: it is your responsibility to confirm that its outputs meet accessibility guidelines.

Tool Accessibility Features Keep In Mind
Word (Desktop)
  • Full Accessibility Checker with in-depth repair options
  • Heading styles, lists, and structured tables
  • Alt text for images and charts
  • Color-contrast and reading-order support
  • Web version lacks some accessibility functions
  • Complex layouts (columns, text boxes) can still break order
  • Must check exported PDFs for tag accuracy
PowerPoint (Desktop)
  • Slide reading-order checker
  • Alt text for visuals
  • Accessible templates
  • Notes pane for transcripts or scripts
  • Web version lacks some accessibility functions
  • Animations and transitions may not be accessible
  • Manual color-contrast checks still required
  • Not all export options are accessible
Adobe Acrobat Pro (PDF)
  • Built-in accessibility checker
  • Tagging and reading-order tools
  • Supports alt text for images
  • Scanned or image-only PDFs require OCR
  • Difficult to remediate
  • Checker alone doesn’t ensure full compliance
Adobe InDesign
  • Export-tagged PDF capability
  • Paragraph and object styles map to accessible tags
  • Color-contrast controls within design panels
  • Accessibility setup requires planning before layout
  • Must verify exported PDF tags manually
  • Not ideal for frequent content updates
Adobe Express (Presentations)
  • Ability to add alt text and readable text layers
  • Export to PDF produces an inaccessible PDF
  • Reading order not always preserved
  • Recommend exporting to PowerPoint for remediation
Adobe Express (Webpages)
  • Clean templates and automatic text hierarchy
  • Caption field for embedded media
  • Responsive design supports zoom
  • Alt-text tool allows for image descriptions
  • Limited heading control (H1–H3 only)
  • Must manually check color contrast
  • Embedded media needs manual alt text
  • Export to PDF produces an inaccessible PDF
Adobe Express (Images)
  • Clean templates and automatic text hierarchy
  • Caption field for embedded media
  • Responsive design supports zoom
  • Alt-text tool allows for image descriptions
  • Limited heading control (H1–H3 only)
  • Must manually check color contrast
  • Embedded media needs manual alt text
  • Export to PDF produces an inaccessible PDF
Adobe Express
  • Add alt text on export
  • Contrast and font-pairing guides
  • Easy resizing for readability
  • No built-in checker for text contrast
  • Alt text field may not carry over to some exports
Teams
  • Live auto-captions in meetings
  • Keyboard shortcuts and screen-reader support
  • Accessible chat and files panel
  • Description hyperlink tool
  • Shared files must be accessible at the source
  • Whiteboard and reactions not read by screen readers
  • Auto-captions may need editing
Zoom
  • Live auto-captioning and transcripts
  • Keyboard shortcuts for controls
  • Screen reader compatibility
  • Description hyperlink tool
  • Whiteboard drawings lack alt text
  • Polls and chat need accessible setup
  • Auto captions may not meet accuracy standards
Outlook (Desktop)
  • Built-in Accessibility Checker
  • Alt text available for inserted images
  • Screen-reader-friendly reading pane
  • Plain text option available
  • Decorative images in signatures can confuse readers
  • Text color/contrast not automatically verified
Microsoft Forms
  • Keyboard and screen-reader support
  • Auto-labeled question fields
  • Simple navigation for respondents
  • Complex branching or grid questions may challenge assistive tech
  • Image questions need manual alt text
  • Templates can create color contrast errors
Qualtrics
  • Screen-reader support for common question types
  • Theme options with better color contrast
  • Supports label tags and section headings
  • Custom code can override accessibility
  • Slider or drag-and-drop questions remain difficult to use